There are so many discussion on whether LOB will shift from Client/Server to Network Computing in my personal opinion LOB can be in both but only ligthswitch can create an application in either architecture without rewriting a single code. Integration is a key to closing big contracts, so far we’ve integrated access with SAP and it was lame in integrating with Oracle views while. Net framework and these includes tons of non-microsoft objects, access only uses microsoft objects native to windows. Integration is due to that fact that it uses the. Now if we compare both functionally in the field of LOB, totally the same, but access prevails in terms of cost and time of development and level of customization for both forms and reports but lightswitch also prevails on integration and networking computing environment. Private Function CreateDataSource() As Objectĭim query As SelectQuery = SelectQueryFluentBuilder.AddTable( "Categories" ).SelectAllColumns().As access developer we need to compare functionally, as far as I know, Allesandro is a VB guy, so most likely he is incline technically, while as an access developer we tend to be inclined functionally, totally different level of comparison, if you compare access technically with lightswitch/vb.net they are totally different and cannot be compared apple per apple such that both software were developed by microsoft. ( New ExpressionBinding( "Text", "Description" ))
Private Function CreateProductsReport() As XtraReportĭim headerBand As New ReportHeaderBand() With Public Function GetReport( ByVal id As String, ByVal context As ReportProviderContext) As XtraReport Implements IReportProvider.GetReport
0 kommentar(er)
